Problem
Why this breaks for small SaaS teams
RAG alone is too loose for product-specific support. Engineering teams need controlled runtime context, key protection, route blocking, and a clear boundary between client hints and trusted tenant scope.
For engineering
Canonica uses safe page context, allowed origins, blocked routes, and governed answer retrieval instead of treating support as loose document search.
Problem
RAG alone is too loose for product-specific support. Engineering teams need controlled runtime context, key protection, route blocking, and a clear boundary between client hints and trusted tenant scope.
Example question
Search the docs for the error code or contact support.
The webhook error is tied to the integration setup surface. Canonica returns the approved setup answer, related FAQ, and fallback ticket path if the error is not covered.
Owner review
Canonica can draft fixes from repeated gaps, but the owner review step keeps generated content from becoming official support truth automatically.
Setup steps
Explore Canonica
Each product area has a dedicated page so founders, support teams, product teams, and engineers can evaluate the part they care about first.
Workspace setup, product profile, starter knowledge, surfaces, widget key, and activation readiness.
One embeddable widget that uses safe page context, allowed origins, blocked routes, and approved answers.
Hosted help, docs, FAQ, changelog, ticket fallback, conversations, and weekly review output.
Product ontology, canonical answers, drift, signal mutation, coverage, and trust/readiness metrics.