Knowledge Governance

Keep support truth accurate as the product changes.

Canonica treats support knowledge as governed product truth: product ontology, canonical answers, drift, signal mutation, coverage, and trust metrics all point owners toward what to review.

app.canonica.app
Human review

Knowledge Governance

Governance queue and answer health

Missed questions, stale release context, negative feedback, and repeated tickets become visible review work before they become bad support habits.

Canonical answers

Approved, scoped answers stay the source of truth before fallback or generated help.

Drift review

Release, scope, deprecated entity, and signal anomaly drift become visible instead of silently misleading users.

Signal mutation

Recurring misses become reviewable proposals or draft answer changes for human approval.

Readiness view
Coverage KPI
Improving
Drift pressure
Visible
Authority
Approved

What this gives the owner

Governance keeps AI support from improvising.

The point is not to let AI answer everything. The point is to make known support truth stable, stale truth visible, and missing truth reviewable.

Product ontology

Features, plans, roles, workflows, states, integrations, and errors can be treated as first-class support concepts.

Approved before authority

Drafts and proposals do not become official support truth until a human approves them.

Drift detection

Canonica makes stale answers visible after releases, scope conflicts, or deprecated product behavior.

Coverage metrics

Owners can see whether important surfaces have enough approved support truth.

Trust readiness

Summary-backed metrics help the owner understand readiness without scanning raw logs.

Workflow

Turn support misses into governed product knowledge.

Governance is the loop: canonical answer first, fallback when needed, signal when weak, owner review, then improved truth for the next user.

1

Serve canonical answer first

If approved knowledge matches the page and scope, Canonica uses it before fallback.

2

Mark fallback clearly

Fallback is useful, but it is not treated as authoritative support truth.

3

Cluster repeated signals

Tickets, low-confidence answers, and negative feedback expose recurring support gaps.

4

Review the proposal

Owners approve, refine, or reject draft improvements before publishing.

5

Improve future answers

Approved changes increase coverage and reduce repeated support load.